Intrusion Detection System Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Intrusion Detection System - Assignment Example The HIDS and NIDS are protective mechanisms, in a computing system that detects and prevents efforts of accessing information from an-authorized parties. I agree with the notion that NIDS is widely based since the computer administrator can install it at various destinations all over the internal computer system. Â  I agree with the notion that HIDS is installed on a workstation or server. This is because the system is an agent of the secured host. Due to this, HIDS serves a particular host and can serve a particular purpose. Â  I agree with David’s answer that the methods of security testing are the white, black and gray box testing. However, I do not agree with the answer that the black box testing system involves knowing the architecture and design of the computer before the testing. Â  Black-box system does not entail any knowledge of architecture, or the interior workings of the computer system, while white box testing involves knowledge of the architecture and design of the computer system. Grey box system involves testing the computing system with limited knowledge of the system, and not as defined by David. Â  I agree with the notion that the person conducting black box testing is an end user. This is because the person doing the test cannot access the source code of the computing system. I also agree with the notion that a system designer conducts white box testing. Â  I agree with David’s notion that Vulnerability testing seeks to identify weaknesses in a computer system, and on his notions that vulnerability tests seek to identify the best places to attack a system. I agree with an answer concerning penetration testing, and its application. Â  

Assignment Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Assignment - Coursework Example A three-step test was established to determine whether Meiorin encountered direct discrimination or adverse effects of discrimination in her lay-off. The test is designed that determine if on balance of probabilities, prima facie discriminatory is a bona fide occupational requirement (Catano, 2010). First, the arbitrator must have established that aerobic standard is rationally connected to job performance. In this case, the research conducted in establishing the aerobic standards were not substantive since they were descriptive and failed to distinguish between male subjects and female subject (Catano, 2010). Second, the arbitrator should have established that the forest service established the aerobic standard in honest and good faith and was essential for the performance of the job. The government honesty in establishing the standard is not disputed since there was no intention to discriminate Ms Meiorin (Catano, 2010). Third, the arbitrator should have established if the standard is reasonably necessary for the accomplishment of the work-related purposes. This means that it will be impossible to accommodate any individual employee sharing similar characteristics as Meiorin without imposing unnecessary hardship to the forest service (Catano, 2010). In this case, the arbitrator should have established that Meiorin posed significant safety risks to herself and the public. In Meiorin, it is clear that she could have performed her duties efficiently without posing significant risks to herself or the public even without meeting the aerobic standard 9 Catano, 2010). The Supreme Court observed that individual testing of Ms Meiorin did not constitute discrimination, but the government had failed in establishing that the aerobic standard is a minimal requirement to efficiently perform the duties of a firefighter. Aerobic discrimination was a prima facie discrimination and Ms